First published in The Daily Sentinel, Friday, March 21, 2008
“Jesus, regardless of where his corpse ended up, is dead and remains dead.”
Think that statement is provocative? Absolutely. Spoken by an atheist or irreligious person? Actually, no. Thomas Sheehan, professor at
“The original Christian community in
Sheehan builds his case for that conclusion through something called historical-critical analysis. He assumes that the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were all written as propaganda – documents designed to convince people to think and behave in particular ways. Therefore, to discover the historical accuracy (or inaccuracy) of the gospels, one has to go into speculative theories as to how those documents came to be written, and what sources may have contributed to their creation. Somewhere in the mist of the unknown, Sheehan concludes, there are documents and facts that contradict the historical accuracy of the gospels.
The gospels are dangerous, and religious historians like Sheehan attempt to “disarm” them because of that danger. What is the danger? That people will believe that God actually does something miraculous! In the worldview formed by modern science and empirical study, there can not be something that stands outside the natural order. People don’t suddenly become alive after death anymore than they can turn into werewolves, vampires, or ghosts.
Marcus Borg, a retired priest in the Episcopal Church, agrees with Sheehan. Jesus did not physically return from death – the resurrection was symbolic and theological. “I think the resurrection of Jesus really happened, but I have no idea if it involves anything happening to his corpse, and, therefore, I have no idea whether it involves an empty tomb … so I would have no problem whatsoever with archaeologists finding the corpse of Jesus. For me, that would not be a discrediting of the Christian faith or the Christian tradition.”
Sheehan and Borg are smart men. On an IQ test, they probably would score much, MUCH higher than I. But intelligence can get in the way of believing when it is used to debunk faith and rationalize it away. I am not anti-intellectual. I think God gave us intelligence as a gift that can be used to help us better understand God, ourselves, and one another. But, as I have said before, every good gift can be abused and misused. Borg and Sheehan have used their intelligence to push us away from understanding the Resurrection as something that actually happened. And I think that’s sad.
Historic, orthodox Christianity insists that God broke through time and space to become REAL – someone who could be touched, fed, clothed – and killed. Further, it insists that God’s actions in that physical reality did something that forever changed human destiny. Christianity, therefore, isn’t simply about how to be emotionally balanced or ethically correct. Christianity is about being physically, emotionally and mentally transformed from what we are to what we were created to be – to bring us into a real relationship with God in this life and beyond. That kind of religion isn’t satisfied with a legendary resurrection of Jesus. It’s not just the empty tomb, it’s also the eyewitness testimonies of actual, physical appearances of a living Jesus, and what happens to them after they believe.
The apostle Paul strongly disagrees with Borg, Sheehan, and other modernists. He wrote in 1 Corinthians 15: “Now, my dear friends, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain.
“For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also.”
“But if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith. More than that, we are then found to be false witnesses about God, for we have testified about God that he raised Christ from the dead. But he did not raise him if in fact the dead are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile.”
Dr. Albert Mohler, another modern scholar, puts Paul’s letter in perspective for us today: “Paul sets himself – and the true Church – against all who deny or deride the empty tomb. Either the tomb is empty, or our faith is in vain. Paul wants nothing to do with the effort to find a spiritual meaning without a historical event, nor with anti-supernaturalism. Against modern skeptics, Paul cared deeply about whether the tomb was empty.”
I also like Dr. Mohler’s conclusions to this controversy of the Resurrection: “Why do so many people hate the very idea of the risen Christ? Because the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead is the vindication of God’s purpose in sending his Son for the redemption of sinners. A world full of degenerate moderns – who do not even see themselves as sinners – wants nothing to do with Jesus Christ as our sinless substitute, who shed his blood for the remission of our sins.”
The liturgy we use during Communion says the mystery of the church is this: “Christ has died. Christ is risen. Christ will come again.” Science and history cannot explain it nor prove it. It can only deny it. What about you? What do you believe? Go to church Sunday and EXPERIENCE the Resurrection for yourself!
Of course! That is the point. Resurrection is NOT possible--apart from the Original Life-giver who sets AND re-sets the dials on what is possible. This is why followers then and now acknowledge that Jesus is Lord. Easter announces The Eternal Order which is on its way.
ReplyDelete